Managing Forest Habitats for Migrant Songbirds
Washington State University
Woodland Fish and Wildlife Publication MISC0198

Neotropical migrant birds play an important role in the forest ecosystem. They help control insects, disperse seeds, and some species may be important pollinators for plants. They also are a major food resource for predatory birds such as owls and hawks. Because Neotropical migrants are typically sensitive to habitat disturbance, they are often viewed as indicators of overall forest health. In Pacific Northwest forests, many Neotropical birds are closely associated with riparian zones, vegetation adjacent to lakes, streams, creeks and wetlands.

For the past several years, breeding populations of several eastern North American Neotropical migrants have been declining. Many factors, including predation, failed reproductive efforts and stresses of winter and migration, contribute to their natural mortality, The factor most strongly implicated in the decline of forest-dwelling Neotropical migrants is the fragmentation and destruction of forested habitat.

Data for the western United States is not complete. However, population trends for some western Neotropical migrants are becoming apparent. Although the western U.S. breeding populations seem to be managing better than their eastern counterparts, some western species may be at risk.

Habitat Features

What is it about a particular area that attracts birds? Factors that affect habitat selection occur on two levels: (1) the local habitat and (2) the individual forest stand. Influential components of local habitat are distribution of plants across the landscape and the existence of special features such as cliffs, snags, and streams. Selection features at the individual stand level may include the successional stage(s) represented and the site’s disturbance history, as well as the nature of surrounding habitat.

To understand more about conservation of Neotropical migrants, it is important to realize how birds depend on the quality of habitat. These birds apparently select habitats that increase their reproductive potential. To reproduce successfully, food abundance and nesting habitat are important. Neotropical migrants, like most species of animals, are sensitive to change. Dramatic changes, such as intense forest fragmentation, clearcutting, and the removal of trees from riparian zones alter the structure of the habitat. Forests may lose structural diversity (i.e., variability in vegetation size and height) if they are intensively managed exclusively for wood production. Loss in habitat diversity, especially reduction in forest vegetation of varying heights, diminishes nesting opportunities for many Neotropical species. This transformation may eventually affect the composition of the year-round bird community.

Snags

Dead trees, called snags, are important to both migratory and resident birds. Snags and dying trees supply cavity-nesting habitat for Neotropical migrants such as swallows, swifts, sapsuckers, small owls, kestrels, and wrens. They also provide homes for insects and other invertebrates that are food for many breeding Neotropical birds. Studies suggest that larger diameter snags enhance both of these habitat features.

Riparian Areas

Many Neotropical migrants live in riparian zones because of the high productivity and diversity of the vegetation. Streams, lakes, and creeks are characterized by dense vegetated areas that provide water, cover, and a wide variety of food sources. Riparian regions are especially important in the drier landscapes of eastern Oregon and Washington.

Canopy Gaps

During the breeding season, many Neotropical migrants prefer to nest in areas with both coniferous trees and deciduous shrubs. Openings in the forest canopy can provide this structural and vertical diversity. When light is allowed to penetrate to the forest floor, there is increased growth of deciduous shrubs. These shrubs help create small patches of habitat important for birds attempting to escape from predators and for young birds in the process of dispersing. New nesting and feeding opportunities may also arise within these habitat patches.

Stand Age

The age of a forest is a strong influence in the distribution and composition of bird species. Each successional stage, from a clearcut to mature, old-growth forest, has a different community of Neotropical migrant birds associated with it. As one stage develops into another, the species composition of the bird community also changes. An increase in one species and a decrease in another may occur at the same time. Because of this relationship, most studies suggest that stands with a mix of as many age classes as possible provide the optimum habitat for these birds.

Nesting Habitat

A mix of trees and shrubs of different heights creates habitats for many different birds and increases the diversity of the overall bird community. The structural features of good nesting habitat are important on many scales, from the area immediately surrounding a single nest site to the entire forested landscape. The success of a single nesting attempt may be highly influenced by the foliage in the immediate vicinity. The denser the foliage surrounding a nest, the less likely a predator will be able to locate it. However, when predators hunt, their success depends on more than just physical barriers. The efficiency of their search for prey may be influenced by the structural complexities of a larger habitat patch that contains many potential nest sites. For example, the hermit thrush prefers to nest in small white fir (
Abies concolor). As the density of white fir increases, the odds of predation go down for each individual hermit thrush nest. Domestic cats prey on wild bird populations and can reduce the population dramatically.

Forest Fragmentation

Forest fragmentation is believed to be one of the greatest threats to Neotropical migrant survival. In the eastern United States, many studies have examined the effects of forest stand size on the species composition of Neotropicals. These studies have found fewer breeding bird species in stands of less than 10 acres in size. This reduction in species may be a function of limited habitat availability (i.e., increased competition for food and nesting sites), or it may be a result of the species’ sensitivity to stand size. Some bird species, such as the hermit thrush and the red-eyed vireo, are considered area-sensitive because they require large tracts of land for their territories. There is concern that these types of birds may become locally extinct in isolated forest fragments where the stand is not big enough to maintain natural populations.

The most dramatic reductions in the numbers of Neotropical migrants have been noted for those birds that use interior forested habitat on both the wintering grounds and the summer breeding areas. Many Neotropical migrant birds that breed in North America spend the winter months in areas less than one-fifth the size of their breeding grounds. Deforestation of wintering grounds thus affects large numbers of birds. The decline of many Neotropical migrants in the eastern United States corresponds to the extensive clearing of the forests of Mexico and Central America, which began in the late 1970s. When winter resources become limited, the remaining habitat can support fewer and fewer birds, potentially reducing the breeding population.

Edge

When a large tract of forest land is broken up into smaller patches, edge is created. Edge is the area of transition between two different vegetation communities, such as forest and meadow. Any serious bird-watcher knows that the greatest variety of birds is found along edges. But too much edge can greatly affect those Neotropical migrants that nest primarily within the forest interior. When an edge is expanded, the amount of edge relative to the amount of interior is increased, and the effects are felt deeper within the interior. Although these edges may support a greater variety of birds, they also attract a large number of predators such as crows, hawks, raccoons, and house cats. As the edge widens, predators venture farther into the interior. Many Neotropical migrants build nests low to the ground, making them extremely vulnerable to predation. If a clutch of nestlings is eaten or destroyed, many birds will not nest again until the following year and will have lost an entire breeding season.

Brood Parasitism

Another danger Neotropical migrants face with increased edge is brood parasitism, a phenomenon that occurs when one bird species lays its eggs in the nest of another. The host birds often raise the brood parasite’s offspring at the expense of their own. Some birds are able to distinguish between the parasitic eggs and their own, and will destroy the alien eggs. Others, such as the vireos and many of the warblers, have developed no defensive reactions to brood parasites, and are experiencing dramatic population declines. The best known brood parasite in Oregon and Washington is the brown-headed cowbird. The cowbird is a Neotropical migrant that is not dependent on interior forest cover, favoring riparian areas and centering its feeding and breeding activities along forest edges. The smaller the fragment of forest, the closer to the edge many interior birds are forced to nest. This increases their vulnerability to brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds and the risk of reproductive failure.

Brown-headed cowbird populations increased as forests across the eastern United States became fragmented. They have since extended their range into the northwestern states.

Forest Management and Succession

There is a relationship between wildlife existence and the composition of trees, shrubs, and other forest vegetation. Diverse habitats can be enhanced or created as part of forest management activities. Proper forest management allows for both forest products and wildlife, including Neotropical migrants.

An important concept in wildlife management is succession, the orderly, predictable change in the kinds and numbers of trees, shrubs, forbs, and animals that inhabit a given place over time. For example, if you wish to maintain populations of birds typically found in the early stages of succession, you must periodically disturb the forest by logging or fire. Conversely, other Neotropical migrants are adapted to older forest habitats. Birds select only those stages of succession to which they are adapted. As stands develop over time, the habitats change, and so do species using those habitats. Many successional stages are relatively short, and the presence of the birds associated with them is equally short-lived. Changing an environment to benefit one species may affect a different species in a negative way. This may also result in changes in successional stages present on a landscape needed by other animals. Thus, by managing for a variety of habitats, a landowner can expect to increase the variety and general abundance of wildlife.

Age Structure

Most forests in Washington and Oregon are even-aged. Similar development with different species occurs east of the Cascades in the absence of fire. Even-aged stands, intensively managed for timber, are generally low in habitat diversity. Such diversity can be increased if these stands are partly harvested or thinned, and if some defective or dead trees (snags) and some healthy or live trees (green or recruitment trees) are left standing. Recruitment trees are those trees left to become snags at a future date.

Snags are critical habitat components. At least three hard and three soft snags (see Glossary) of the larger sizes should be retained per acre to maintain a cavity-nesting bird population. Snags should be of the largest available diameter, preferably over 20 inches at breast height (BDH). Snags and recruitment trees are particularly valuable to cavity-nesting birds, and are used by over 40 species. They need not be highly valuable commercial trees; in fact, large wolf trees with many branches are ideal because they are worth less at the mill or for export. Preferably, leave the least vigorous trees, so that they will die more rapidly. In riparian areas such trees should be located so that they shade the water surface, and should have the potential of falling into the stream channel to provide fish habitat, thus directly benefiting aquatic resources.

Uneven-aged stands have three or more age classes. These are managed by selectively harvesting individual trees or small groups of trees at periodic intervals or by allowing natural processes to occur over a very long time. This system is best suited to those areas where the dominant tree species are generally shade tolerant, since reproduction must occur in the partial shade of older trees. Ponderosa pine forests east of the Cascades, for example, can be either even- or uneven-aged in structure. Silvicultural systems that perpetuate uneven-aged stands have generally been more successful on the eastside. In low-elevation westside forests, wind-thrown trees, unwanted shrubs, severe stem and root rot, and tree species shifts to alder or maple have rendered the system mostly unworkable. If poorly applied, the system can quickly lead to high-grading, the repeated harvesting of the best trees, leaving the poorer ones to regenerate the forest.

Bird Forest Strata Use

Vertical Development

Vertical development of tree and shrub species is affected by shade tolerance, stocking, site quality, and disturbance factors. Over time, competition for sunlight and soil nutrients influences the height of shrubs and trees. This difference eventually results in overtopping and the death of species that cannot compete. Many Neotropical migrants thrive when there is a greater diversity of plant species and growth forms. If you wish to maintain diverse Neotropical migrant populations, use silvicultural systems that develop well-defined canopy layers from the tree canopy to the forest floor.

Management of Mature Stands

For mature stands west of the Cascades, use clearcut or green-tree retention systems to create diversity. On the eastside, use shelterwood, patch clearcut, or selective logging systems.

In the shelterwood method, about one-third of the trees are removed in the course of three entries carried out over a 5- to 10-year period. This results in approximately half sunlight and half shade on the forest floor. Allow the area to get “brushy,” using herbicides sparingly.

Patch clearcuts can be used if the patches are kept to less than 10 acres. Analysis has shown that leaving large patches unharvested for interior bird species, and grouping harvest patches for early successional and edge bird species, can accommodate all birds and return the same cut of fiber. Consideration should be given to what other owners have done in your region. Locate patches so that habitat transitions occur between stand types. Patch clearcuts are often called for if you have predominantly shade-intolerant species such as red alder or lodgepole pine, or if bark beetle or root rot problems are severe.

The aggregated green-tree retention (AGTR) system is experimental, but it holds promise for Neotropical migrants. In this system, an undisturbed portion of the forest is retained as a kind of “island” in a harvest unit. This aggregate is maintained throughout the life of the next rotation to provide biological “legacies” for the future. Over time these areas should provide late successional habitats of increasing wildlife value. Generally, the size should be large enough to include the biological diversity of the existing stand. Multiple islands in midslope and riparian areas are desirable. These islands must provide enough undisturbed area to prevent displacement of wildlife. Because of limited trials and research, use of AGTR on the eastside is not well understood. However, the concept should still apply. Higher-elevation mixed conifer forests hold the most promise for this new technique.

In the selective logging system, more commonly applied on the eastside, trees that are the
oldest in the stand, not necessarily the largest, are harvested at approximately 10-year intervals. Shrub management is important to maintain canopy-layer diversity and allow for adequate natural regeneration of the trees. Too many shrubs will hinder the natural regeneration of the trees; too few shrubs may result in harsh environments for young trees.

Management of Immature Stands

A common practice in immature stands is thinning. Some of the trees in the stand are removed to provide additional light and nutrients to those that remain. Thinning is a fundamental technique that promotes increased tree health and vigor, and can also create small openings in the forest
canopy for light to reach the forest floor. Whenever light reaches the forest floor, new plant diversity is stimulated. For timber management, the smallest or most defective trees are cut to promote a healthier stand. However, this “low thinning” may be detrimental to some Neotropical migrants, especially those that use the mid-canopy regions. If your forest management goal is to increase Neotropical migrant habitats leave some dead standing trees and some nonmerchantable live trees that occupy the mid-canopy areas. Even small snags (less than 8 inch DBH) will have value for wildlife and should be retained during a thinning. It is a good idea to vary the leave-tree density as well. Small groups of leave trees will provide some protection from windthrow. Commercial thinning done during the winter will minimize the disturbance to Neotropical migrants.

On the westside, some landowners thin repeatedly to maintain and develop multiple age and size classes in predominantly Douglas-fir stands. This approach is more likely to be successful on sites where root rot and soil compaction are not serious concerns. The long-term effects of this practice on biological diversity and soil properties are not known.
In eastside forests, multiple-entry thinning has been used by some landowners as a viable commercial harvest technique. This method allows them to adjust species composition for both habitat and economic reasons. A high degree of skill is required to implement this technique successfully.

Recommendations for Each Stand Type

If your goal is to provide for the broad needs of a variety of Neotropical migrant species, try to attain the best possible mix of the stand conditions discussed below.
Take into account the habitat provided by land adjacent to yours. As stands develop over time, their habitats change. And as these habitats change, so do the Neotropical migrant species.

Grass and Forb Type

If your property already contains some open land, you can maintain a healthy mixture of vegetation types by establishing grasses and forbs by seeding, periodic burning, grazing, or mowing. This kind of habitat can be created by making openings in existing stands, using small clearcut patches, and seeding the disturbed area with a grass or legume mix. On the eastside, forest-land grazing is common. However, grazing is sometimes incompatible with ground nesting Neotropical migrants and should be monitored carefully. Protection of riparian areas from grazing is desirable whenever possible.

Shrub Type

Shrubs provide many wildlife species with food, cover, and shelter. You can meet the cover needs of Neotropical migrants by leaving existing brush areas unplanted or by thinning the tree canopy to stimulate shrub growth. Desired shrubs often require direct sunlight. Shrubs can also be planted to create habitat, and specialized nurseries have appropriate planting stock. Try to plant and retain native species that produce berries. If herbicide use is necessary to control competing vegetation, consider leaving some areas untreated to retain shrub habitat. Leaving wider-than-required no-spray buffers along waterways and wetlands is also recommended. On the westside, consider cutting alder rather than spraying, when possible. Cut in summer after the alder is in full leaf to avoid resprouting. Alder can sprout even if it is less than 1 inch in diameter at the ground line during the dormant season. Be sure to cut below the lowest lateral branch.

Immature Second Growth Conifers

Thin these stands periodically to maintain a healthy, vigorous condition. Patch thinning is highly recommended in older stands to provide more light to the forest floor. Leave some standing dead and defective live trees as well as cavity trees or nesting trees. Unfortunately, wildlife diversity in these monetarily valuable stands is often low. Selective thinning helps maintain trees and shrubs in many canopy layers. Retain recruitment trees for the next generation of snags. On the eastside, favor shade-intolerant or intermediate shade-tolerant species such as western larch and ponderosa pine whenever possible.

Mature Second Growth Conifers

West of the Cascades, use a shelterwood system, patch clearcut, or aggregated green-tree retention system. Use the shelterwood system on the eastside. The selective logging system can be tried east of the Cascade crest. If you use this system, take into account tree vigor, species, location, and health, as well as age. Do not high-grade. Select trees to harvest based on their age, species, and location. Harvest trees that display insects, diseases — especially bark beetles, root and stem rots, and dwarf mistletoe. If possible, minimize the period of disruption by limiting silvicultural activities to small areas, and complete them in a short time. Simultaneous logging of adjacent drainages should be avoided. Retain snags whenever practical. Try to avoid logging between late February and mid-July in pine forests because of the increased likelihood of
Ips (pine engraver) beetle attacks.

It is best to seek advice from a competent wildlife biologist and or forester before implementing silvicultural treatments to improve Neotropical migrant habitats.

Checklist of things you can do to improve
habitat for Neotropical migrant birds in your forest:



   • Maintain habitat diversity.
Retain or create a variety of tree and plant species, diameters, heights and spacings. Leave uncut patches, and vary thinning densities. Consider habitat on neighboring properties when planning your activities.
   • Protect riparian vegetation along waterways and wetlands. Restrict harvesting, herbicide applica-tion, and grazing in these critical habitat areas. Restore riparian vegetation in areas where it has been removed or damaged.
   • Retain and create snags and wildlife reserve trees. Preferably, select large diameter trees of little or no commercial value; including damaged, deformed, and large-limbed “wolf trees.”
   • Establish native trees, shrubs, and seed mixtures known to be beneficial to birds.
   • Protect mid to lower canopy level vegetation, including berry-producing shrubs, during forest man-agement activities.
   • Limit herbicide use. Consider manual control of competing vegetation where practical. Leave untreated areas, especially those with berry-producing shrubs, if herbicide application is needed to control competing vegetation.
   • Install and maintain nest boxes as a short-term habitat enhancement where preferred snag and reserve trees are limited or not available.
   • Limit forest management activities during breeding season. Most Neotropical migrant birds breed during spring and early summer (April 1 - August 1).

Copyrighted by Washington State University Cooperative Extension, Oregon State University Extension Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1998.


Make Your Land More Appealing to Wild Birds:
Maintain Native Plants!

University of Washington, College of Forest Resources
Wildlife Science Program
Fact Sheet #10, November 2000

The population of Washington State is expected to double over the next 50 years. As a result, urban and suburban development will increase dramatically, especially in the Puget Sound region. Conservation of birds and other wildlife will become increasingly difficult as natural habitats are lost (Figure 1 [deleted]). Successful conservation will require creative partnerships involving regional and local landowners who manage the land for the benefit of birds. One way we can begin this process is to increase the suitability of both our yards and parks as habitat for native birds. Areas less than an acre or as large as several hundred acres need special components to be attractive nesting areas for birds. University of Washington College of Forest Resources researchers suggest important resources all landowners and land managers can provide to increase the suitability of their lands for nesting birds.

Why do I need to know where birds nest? Although birds nest in many different species of plants, they have preferences. Knowing what types of plants native birds are likely to nest in can help you choose shrubs and trees that are both attractive to nesting birds and are suited to the conditions of your property.

Where do birds nest?
Researchers at the University of Washington have found birds nesting on the ground, in shrubs, in the lower portions of trees, in the canopy of the forest, and in dead trees (Figure 2). Within these zones, birds are more successful at producing young where dense vegetation obscures the nest. Because birds nesting in the canopy are very difficult to study, this fact sheet focuses on birds that can be found nesting in shrubs and on the ground.

Bird Additions 5:20:05 1

How can I provide nesting opportunities for ground and shrub nesting species? Birds will nest in your yard if provided with the right habitat. However, birds often have requirements for nesting that are not met by the average yard. A highly manicured yard with non-native plantings is not attractive to most species. To attract nesting birds, plant native species that are suited to the conditions of your yard (Figure 3). If you want to maintain some lawn or exotic shrubs, you can provide habitat for nesting birds by devoting a specific area of your yard to native shrubs. However, this area must be fairly large, and protected from predators such as cats (well fed-cats kill millions of birds each year). A patch of salmonberry 15' by 15' may very well attract a pair of American Robins or Swainson's Thrushes—especially if set against a fence or forest that provides additional cover. Juncos, Song Sparrows, and Spotted Towhees will use a similar-sized patch of sword fern or salal. Birds also nest in larger, but very narrow, patches of vegetation. A simple solution is to plant a strip of native vegetation about six feet wide along one side of your property or, better yet, around the perimeter.

Bird Additions 5:20:05 2

Are there any unusual nesting locations that I should consider? Yes!
Dead upright trees (snags) and downed logs are important for many species, both as a source of food in the form of insects and as nesting sites. Woodpeckers use snags both for feeding and for nesting. Many other birds such as owls, chickadees, and Winter Wrens use old woodpecker holes as nesting sites. Downed logs are also used by many species for feeding and nesting. Another important nesting location is among the roots of upturned trees. This is a favorite nesting spot of Winter Wrens and Pacific-slope Flycatchers. Although unsightly, please allow dead wood to remain on your property.

Is providing a nest site good enough?
It takes more than a good nest site for birds to be successful. If you choose to provide nesting habitat for birds, you must also be willing to protect the birds you attract. It would be better to have a yard devoid of birds than to attract them to a place where their nesting attempts are doomed to failure. Provide cover to decrease the chance that predators will find the nest. If cats or rats frequent your yard, remove them or don' there. Nest failure is also caused by human disturbance. If you know the location of an active nest, avoid the area as much as possible until the young have left the nest. In addition to nesting sites, birds need food and water. Just allowing your property to produce natural foods and to hold water during the dry season can help bird populations.